Dell Inspiron e. 14. Inspiron 6. 40m Review (pics, specs)by Kevin Giberson. The Dell Inspiron e. Intel Core Duo CPU, seems designed for those who value a combination of significant processing power and portability but don’t want to spend a lot of money to get it.
The Dell Inspiron e1705 is a 17" widescreen notebook and the first Inspiron to be released with the new Intel Core Duo processor. The "e" in e1705 stands for. What can you do if the laptop LCD screen turned completely white? From my experience I can tell that this.
This model, also named the Inspiron 6. Dell’s Small Business website, replaces the non- business XPS M1. Inspiron 6. 30m when sold as a business model), and its primary advantage over its predecessor is the dual core option. Like the Inspiron e. I recently purchased and reviewed, and the Inspiron e. Windows XP Media Center Edition, which includes a host of entertainment and multimedia features that appear to target those who desire a computer that will readily and capably handle the ever- increasing entertainment possibilities of our world.
One significant difference between the e. But you can’t have everything, including portability, for a mere seven or eight hundred dollars, which is about what a well- configured e. Dell Inspiron e. 14.
Dell Inspiron e. 14. Specs: Processor: Intel Yonah Core Duo T2. GHz/2. MB L2 Cache) OS: Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition. Hard Drive: 8. 0 GB SATA @ 5. RPM (manufactured by Hitachi)Screen: 1. Academy Football Trials In The Uk What Is A Jumper here. But as noted, I did recently buy an e.
And although I have no plans to buy an e. I often recommend notebooks to friends and family. As I use the e. 14. I find myself wondering whether it would be a good option for them.
I would definitely recommend this notebook if someone were to say the following: “I want a notebook that’s pretty easy to carry around and can even be used on a plane. I’m on a tight budget and don’t want to pay more than eight hundred dollars or so, but I really don’t want to sacrifice performance. I have no plans to play the latest games, but I want good multimedia capabilities and a pretty high resolution. I’d also like it to be sturdy.” The key here is the price; which is, admittedly, what often enhances the appeal of Dell notebooks. In the case of the above- stated requirements, I consider the e. I’ve tested it fairly thoroughly with particular emphasis on word processing, audiovisual performance and the Internet.
Actually, I didn’t buy this laptop; it is a review model. But as noted, I did recently buy an e1705, and will therefore be viewing this e1405 within that context. In this guide I will disassemble a laptop LCD screen in order to remove and replace the backlight lamp (CCFL).
Initial Impressions. Several things struck me when I first looked at the e. It was very tiny when compared to the e. Mini- Me to the e.
It felt solid; Although fairly small and light, it wasn’t exactly thin; and The silver with white trim looked pretty good in a smaller package. Now for the thickness: I was reacting to the difference between the e. IBM Think. Pad T4. I had previously used as my primary computer. In the end, however, the e. T4. 0. There is something visually appealing about a very thin notebook, but in practical terms, a half inch or so doesn’t make that much difference when the overall dimensions and weight are taken into account. On a long plane ride, the real issues are depth and width, not height.
Design and Build. Above view of Inspiron e. While my favorite notebook design is solid black, the e.
More importantly, at least for me, the e. LCD cover feels quite strong. One very minor complaint is that there’s a little play in the latches when the notebook is closed: not much, and not enough to affect my overall view of this notebook, but the latches of the e. Overall, however, fit and finish are good, particularly given the price. Dell Inspiron e. 14.
Left side view of Dell e. Right side view of Dell e. Back side view of Dell e. The Screen. Dell Inspiron e. The True. Life glossy screen is well beyond adequate: bright, sharp, and easy to work with at the native resolution of 1.
I definitely wouldn’t want to go any higher than this resolution on a 1. I’m surprised that I don’t find myself wanting to go lower. Screen (view large image) Yes, the screen is a tad shiny, and if you set your Windows desktop to black, you can use the LCD to help you comb your hair, floss, brush your teeth or put on makeup, But more and more notebook sellers are limiting the availability of matte screens in their non- business lines, and whether it’s called Bright. View, XBRITE, Tru. Brite or, in this particular case, True.
Life, the glossy option does make for very nice video. Moreover, everything on the screen appears sharp and well defined.
I chose the matte display for the e. True. Life LCD would have been fine too, had it been available at a lower resolution than 1. As it stands, watching a movie on the e. Small amount of light leakage displayed on the e. Because a number of purchasers of the e.
I thought I should address this issue and therefore devoted some time to unearthing the problem in this particular machine, both with the naked eye and the digital camera. Waiting patiently for nightfall to come, I turned off all the lights, got rid of the Windows Taskbar, and looked as closely as I could at the screen, then took scads of digital pictures. At the risk of appearing to be a sensory dullard, I must say that at first I could really see no problem when using eyesight alone, though the camera did reveal light leakage at the base of the LCD. Subsequently there were occasions when I noticed some leakage, but only when the background was dark or when I used Dead Pixel Buddy to set the screen to black. Having said all that, I should add that during my actual use of this notebook, I never once noticed a problem. Honda Cbr600rr Service Manual 2007 Colorado.
Of course, others may well be more sensitive to light leakage than I am, and certain screen configurations might be more affected. Dell e. 14. 05 Screen on the left compared to e.
Graphics. The Intel GMA 9. Windows Vista when it finally becomes available. Having now used GMA 9. I can think of is this: Don’t expect the e. Which really isn’t much of a caveat at all, given the adequacy of the GMA 9. Internet, general office work, etc. Sound. Despite a somewhat tinny quality and limited bass, which is to be expected from notebook speakers, the audio is decent: loud and clear enough to watch a movie or listen to music without headphones, as long as there isn’t a lot of background noise.
As I’ve found to be the case with every notebook I’ve ever used, even inexpensive headphones improve the sound considerably. Processor and Performance. For anyone who has ever tried to run several demanding programs at once, the Intel Core Duo is a real treat, and this T2. GHz is the slowest of the T2. XXX Yonah series, performs exceedingly well and seems to offer very little trade- off when compared to the 2. GHz CPU in my e. 17.
I continue to be amazed by what two cores will get you, though it makes perfect sense that they will handle multiple applications much better than a single- core CPU. As with the T2. 50. I tested this T2. Super PI to 3. 2 million digits. With these fairly demanding applications running, I still managed to watch a DVD and open several Internet Explorer windows, together with Open.
Office. org Writer, and everything ran quite smoothly. Because purchasing a Dell computer invariably involves a very careful selection of components, if price is any concern at all, I would now find it easy to suggest the selection of the Yonah T2.
Core Duo CPUs; it performs exceptionally well and the premium paid to get a T2. Or simply save the money. Benchmarks. I have now gotten fantastic Super PI results (running pi out to the standard 2 million digits) from two separate Dells using Yonah CPUs: Super Pi Results: Below are the Super Pi result calculations for crunching the numbers on 2- million digits of accuracy for Pi: Notebook.
Time Dell Inspiron e. GHz Intel T2. 30. Dell Inspiron e. 17.
GHz Intel T2. 50. Sony VAIO FS6. 80 (1. GHz Pentium M) 1m 5. IBM Think. Pad T4. GHz Pentium M) 1m 4. IBM Think. Pad Z6. GHz Pentium M) 1m 3.
Fujitsu Life. Book N3. GHz Pentium M) 1m 4. Dell Inspiron 6. 00. D (1. 6 GHz Pentium M) 1m 5. Dell Inspiron 6. 00. M (1. 6 GHz Pentium M) 2m 1. HP Pavilion dv. 40.
GHz Pentium M) 1m 3. Asus V6. Va (Pentium M 1. GHz) 1m 4. 6s Lenovo Think.
Pad T6. 0 (2. 0. GHz Core Duo) 1m 1. While the 3. DMark. GMA 9. 50 should be fine for most uses: 3. DMark. 05: Notebook 3. DMark 0. 5 Results.
Dell Inspiron e. 14. GHz Intel T2. 30. Intel GMA 9. 50) 5.
DMarks Apple Mac. Book Pro (2. 0. GHz Core Duo, ATI X1.
MB 2. 86. 6 3. D Marks. Dell Inspiron e. 17.
GHz Intel T2. 50. ATI X1. 40. 0) 1,7.
D Marks. Think. Pad T4. GHz, ATI X3. 00 6. MB graphics) 7. 27 3. DMarks Asus V6. Va (2. GHz Pentium M, ATI Radeon Mobility x. MB) 2,5. 30 3. D Marks Fujitsu n.
GHz Core Duo, ATI X1. MB) 2,2. 73 3. DMarks HP dv. GHz Pentium M, ATI X7. MB) 2,5. 36 3. D Marks Acer Travel.
Mate 8. 20. 4WLMi (2. GHz Core Duo, ATI X1. MB) 4,1. 57 3. DMarks. PCMark. 04 yielded 4. PCMarks overall, with the T2. T2. 50. 0, in all but the graphics- based tests, where the x.
GMA 9. 50. Compared to a single- core Pentium M running at a comparable speed, the multithreaded results were roughly double, attesting to the efficiency and performance of the Core Duo: PCMark. PCMark. 05: . Below is the overall PCMark. Notebook. PCMark.
Score Dell Inspiron e. GHz Intel T2. 30. PCMarks. Fujitsu N6.
GHz Core Duo)3,4. PCMarks Alienware M7.
AMD Athlon FX- 6. PCMarks. Sony Vaio SZ- 1. B in Speed Mode (Using Nvidia Ge. Force Go 7. 40. 0) 3,6. PCMarks Panasonic Tough. Book T4 (Intel 1. GHz LV)1,3. 90 PCMarks.
Asus V6. J (1. 8. GHz Core Duo T2. 40. PCMarks. Toshiba Satellite M7. Pentium M 1. 8. 6GHz)1,8. PCMarks. Below are detailed results for PCMark. The HD Tune performance results of this 8.
GB Hitachi drive are slightly better than the 1. GB Toshiba drive in the e. Keyboard and Touchpad. Keyboard and touchpad view of e. Although I prefer the keyboard of the e.
Think. Pad T4. 0, the e. I can’t possibly count the number of different keyboards I’ve used over the years, but each one takes a little getting used to, and the keyboard of the e. Nonetheless, the feel is good and the noise really is minimal. If pressed to compare this keyboard to the countless others I’ve used, I’d say it ranks in the 9. The touchpad is also responsive and easy to work with, though I doubt I’ll ever prefer a touchpad in place of the pointing stick of the T4.